All, I've taken a stab at addressing all the DISCUSS points and comments. Hopefully this moves us closer.
Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-paws-protocol-15 Summary of updates: o Clarified why spectrum-notify is "informational" o Clarified that device registration is typically only required for fixed devices o Global statement about timestamp format and must be UTC o Global statement about MISSING error returned, whether it's required by PAWS or ruleset o Clarified UNSUPPORTED error o Mandate that Database-change must be included in all responses a minimum of 2 weeks before change o Clarified that preconfigured values are ruleset specific (INIT_RESP) o Added reference to FCC ruleset for registration of Fixed Devices o Make deviceOwner and serialNumber optional at PAWS level and required on a per-ruleset basis o Update description for "location" to be where device intends to operate, rather than "current location" o For REGISTRATION_RESP, add clarification that when it is returned, it will have at least one RulesetInfo. Otherwise, it's an UNSUPPORTED error. o Clarified that, when a Master Device asks for spectrum on behalf of a Slave Device, there are 2 locations in the message and changed masterDeviceLocation to be required o Indicate that power levels are typically EIRP (as opposed to conducted power to the antenna) o Added description for a "schedule" o Add intro to DEVICE_VALID_REQ o TLS: Follow best practices to improve security and interop. Reference draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp o TLS: Use OCSP for better performance; RFC6960 o TLS: When using client auth, Database determines acceptable root CAs o Extensibility: Add statement that no extensions that return device information will not be accepted o Clarify IANA instructions for the Ruleset ID Registry o Security: Acknowledge that unauthorized access to device registration, other sensitive device info is a risk, and indicate that privacy policies must be published and implement to control access. Thanks! -vince On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:59 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > A new version (-15) has been submitted for draft-ietf-paws-protocol: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-paws-protocol-15.txt > > Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed > > > The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-paws-protocol/ > > Diff from previous version: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-paws-protocol-15 > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > IETF Secretariat. > > -- -vince
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
