All,
Summary of changes:
o More precise language: "supports none of the ruleset" instead of
"does not support any ruleset", where it makes sense.
o Batch request: Change MAY to MUST when some locations are
acceptable
o Remove explicit mention of OCSP and leave it up the the TLS best
practices draft
o Define power levels as EIRP for consistency
Thanks!
-vince
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A new version (-16) has been submitted for draft-ietf-paws-protocol:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-paws-protocol-16.txt
>
>
> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-paws-protocol/
>
> Diff from previous version:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-paws-protocol-16
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> IETF Secretariat.
>
>
--
-vince
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
