On Sep 8, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL. That was the exact wording in Draft 12, but one of the ADs found it > confusing and suggested rewording.
I agree that it's not ideal, but the new wording was actually ambiguous, whereas the wording I offered is merely confusing. :) How about: If the Database examines the registration for each ruleset and can find no ruleset for which it can accept registration, the Database MUST return the NOT_REGISTERED error (See Error Codes (Section 5.17)). I think this is less confusing, but lacks the ambiguity of the new text that the other AD proposed. :) _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
