----- Original Message -----
From: yaya <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:  Why Indonesia should legally protect its environment better

Why Indonesia should legally protect its environment better
By Sarah Waddell

JAKARTA (JP): Virtually every national constitution revised or adopted since
1970 has addressed environmental concerns. An important question in view of
the constitutional amendments that will be considered by the Indonesian
People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) this month is will Indonesia be the
only country in recent times not to take the opportunity to strengthen
constitutional protection of its natural heritage?

The relevant article in the body of the Constitution is Article 33(3), which
states: "Land and water and the natural resources therein shall be
controlled by the State and shall be utilized for the greatest welfare of
the people."

Why is Article 33(3) inadequate? One reason is that it is placed within a
chapter entitled Social Welfare which in fact deals with the structure of
the economy.

In terms of environmental protection, Article 33(3) does not focus on the
environment but on who should benefit from the exploitation of the
environment.

In regard to the duty of the state there is no guidance as to how the state
is to utilize the environment for the greatest welfare of the people. It is
completely within the state's discretion.

Furthermore, it is conceivable that environmental protection will not always
be perceived as being for the greatest welfare of the people. For example,
preservation of an endangered species or a sensitive ecosystem may not
clearly fall within Article 33(3) if there is a conflict with economic
growth.

A fundamental weakness in Article 33(3) is that it formulates environmental
management only in terms of a duty of the state. It does not grant a human
right to a clean and healthy environment. In this regard, it is out of step
with developments worldwide over the last 30 years which have increasingly
acknowledged the connection between human rights and preservation of the
environment.

New constitutions and amended constitutions in other countries could provide
guidance for Indonesia.

Models

One of the most frequently cited constitutional provisions is from the new
Brazilian constitution, which states that: "everybody has a right to an
ecologically balanced environment, an asset for common use by the people,
and essential to the wholesome quality of life. This imposes upon Public
Authorities and the community the obligation to defend and preserve it for
present and future generations." Article 225 of Chapter VI.

Similar provisions are to be found in the new constitutions of Slovakia,
Slovenia, Hungary, Poland and South Africa. Other states with explicit
environmental rights provisions include Turkey and numerous Middle American,
African and Arab states.

Article 66 of the constitution of Portugal is notable as it places
environmental obligations on the state and so may be compared to Article
33(3). Unlike Article 33(3) in the Indonesian Constitution, the role of the
state has, however, been clearly specified. It states:

1. All have the right to a human, healthy and ecologically balanced human
environment and the duty to protect it.

2. The state is obliged, through its agencies and by appeal and support of
popular initiatives:

(a) to prevent and control pollution and its effects and harmful forms of
erosion;

(b) to organize territorial space so as to establish biologically stable
zones;

(c) to create and develop natural and recreational parks and reserves ...
(d) to promote rational enjoyment of natural resources while safeguarding
their capacity for renewal and ecological stability;

In a similar approach, many EU member states including Germany, the
Netherlands, Sweden, Finland and Greece have recently adopted environmental
duties and state obligations to provide environmentally sound conditions.

The 1993 amendment to the German constitution included a new Article 20(a)
that defines care for conditions of life and for future generations as a
state obligation. Other countries that have made constitutional amendments
to accommodate environmental responsibilities include France, Belgium and
Luxembourg.

Why is amendment to Article 33(3) needed? The reasons include the following:

* Constitutional rights and duties act as fundamental principles that have
to be taken into account by all branches of government when they create,
interpret or apply the ordinary law.

* Constitutional provisions apply to arrangements between private
individuals as well as to relations between the public and the state.

* Constitutional guarantees that take the form of human rights may be
directly exercised by an affected individual.

* Once environmental protection provisions are contained in a constitution
it is difficult to alter them. Thus they provide greater certainty than
legislative provisions.

More specifically in regard to Article 33(3), it should be pointed out that
where environmental legislation and/or regulations are incomplete or where
the government is unable to carry out enforcement action, constitutional
guarantees provide protection for affected communities and those acting on
behalf of the environment.

Finally, there is still a high degree of legal uncertainty in environmental
law in Indonesia as is being shown, for example, in the PT Inti Indorayon
dispute. The commonly heard call for "legal certainty" in Indonesia is
linked to the effective formulation of constitutional rights, powers, duties
and obligations.

The sitting of the MPR in August to consider constitutional amendments
provides an opportunity for both the protection of Indonesia's natural
heritage and the enhancement of legal certainty. It should not be missed.

(For the summary of environmental provisions in national constitutions the
writer is indebted to an article by Prof. Klaus Bosselmann, University of
Auckland entitled Human Rights and the Environment: Redefining Fundamental
Principles.

The writer is an environmental lawyer from Sydney who is currently based in
Jakarta writing a doctoral thesis on environmental law in Indonesia.


------------------------------------------------------
Nur Hidayati (Yaya)
WALHI National Executive
Jl. Tegal Parang Utara 14 Jakarta 12790
INDONESIA
Tel. 62 21 7919 3363
Fax. 62 21 794 1673
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<Http://www.walhi.or.id>

��-


~~~~~~ PRODUKSI BERSIH (PB) MAILING LIST ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posting  = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berhenti  = Kirim Email ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] dengan pesan UNSUBSCRIBE PB
Berlangganan  = Kirim Email ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] dengan pesan SUBSCRIBE PB
Administrator  = [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Forum KMB Indonesia @ http://www.forumkmb.dml.or.id
Bursa Limbah Indonesia @ http://www.w2p.dml.or.id

~~~~~~ PRODUKSI BERSIH (PB) MAILING LIST ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Kirim email ke