I played with the beta of studio recorder. I find it gets a sort of weird sound when you time compress slower songs to make them a faster tempo. I wonder how those guys on the daily source code do mash-ups? How they get the words out of a song and mix it in a new one? A good example is the sharp dressed party Adam played on March 10. You don't hear the music of the Party song, rather that of Sharp Dressed Man. I always wondered what they use to "unmix" tracks. Maybe the same technology could be used to take jaws out of recordings made with what you hear.
----- Original Message ----- From: "RQJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <Pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 8:00 PM Subject: Re: An Audio Decision That Requires Some Thought > Hi Jamie, > Sounds like you have pretty much made your decision. > You felt SoundForge was a resource hog, and probably more program than you > need. > And Studio Recorder is not the only sound editor one will ever need, > so, it sounds like you're are left with GoldWave. > The price is right,and it is probably as much sound editor as you will > ever > need, unless you plan to do some really specialized professional > recordings. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamie Pauls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:08 AM > Subject: An Audio Decision That Requires Some Thought > > >> When it was first released, I purchased Sound Forge 6 with noise >> reduction >> and Jim Snowbarger's scripts. I have since decided that Sound Forge was >> probably a lot more program than I really needed. I also purchased Studio >> Recorder which I really like for certain projects that I have worked on >> over >> the past couple or three years. As those of you who have used it know, >> Studio Recorder will never be the only sound editor anyone will ever use; >> it >> has some very specialized features that are quite unique to it. >> >> On my 800MHz Pentium III computer, I found Sound Forge to be a real >> resource >> hog, and Jim's scripts didn't always behave as expected. No disrespect >> intended, Jim, if you're reading this. My old computer's sound card was a >> bit ornery anyway. >> >> I have recently purchased a Pentium 4 2.66GHz computer and have installed >> Studio Recorder. Now for my decision, hence my request for feedback from >> the >> list. I am looking at three options. >> >> 1. Install Sound Forge 6 with noise reduction. >> 2. Evaluate Sound Forge 8 and pay for the upgrade, approximately $150 if >> I >> read it correctly. >> 3. Download and evaluate Goldwave, and possibly pay $48 for yet another >> audio program. >> >>>From the standpoint of accessibility and footprint, which sound editor >>>would >> the majority of respondents suggest and why? Let's pretend that money is >> no >> object, which is certainly not the case. I have just promised myself that >> I'm not going to install and uninstall a myriad of software on this >> machine, >> so I want to plan my moves carefully. Thanks for all thoughtful >> responses. >> >> Jamie Pauls, MT-BC >> http://www.accesswatch.info >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
