You may be right. Does any one know of a better choice then Lame?
Cheers. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Schindler" <garys5...@comcast.net> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 6:53 AM Subject: Re: Latest GoldWave I think it is the Lame encoder. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Gillard" <kgill...@shaw.ca> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 8:27 PM Subject: Latest GoldWave > Hi folks, > > Is it me, or, is Goldwave becoming slower over time. > > I am doing some batch conversions on a PC with a quad core processor, > loads > of memory and a 0 hardware RAID Array and still, takes as long to complete > the job as it once did on my vallient old P4 box. > > Is it GW or, is it the Lame encoder or what! > > Opinions? > > KG > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4136 (20090606) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4138 (20090608) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4138 (20090608) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
