I would assume so, since according to Wikipedia: FLAC is suitable for everyday audio playback and archival, with support for tagging, cover art and fast seeking. FLAC's free and open source royalty-free nature makes it well-supported by many software applications. FLAC playback support in portable audio devices and dedicated audio systems is limited at this time, compared to formats like MP3, but FLAC is supported out of the box by more hardware devices than competing lossless formats like WavPack.
-- Christopher [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of André van Deventer Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 4:29 AM To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' Subject: RE: the best audio file to use when ripping a cd with cdex Does flak not also allow you to input album and track info - something you cannot do with wav? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Olesen Sent: 09 May 2010 11:06 AM To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' Subject: RE: the best audio file to use when ripping a cd with cdex Hi, If you use lossless flacc it's as good as wave. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Casey Sent: 8. maj 2010 22:22 To: PC Audio Subject: the best audio file to use when ripping a cd with cdex Hi what I would like to know is when you rip a CD with CD EX and you want the best uncompressed audio is it better to use wav or flack? Or is the only difference between wav and flack the size of the file? Thank you all and have a nice day. Casey To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected]
