I agree with the points of the design. The 520 is perfect. I love the stuff on 
the side, and the fact that I have the belt clip.  I can literally press record 
on the go. I hate having to remove the recorder to start recording, then have 
to put it back again.
Maybe I need to look at other opms.
Any ideas?
Steph

----- Original Message -----
From: john riehl  <realma...@verizon.net>
To: "'Pc Audio Discussion List'"  <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Date: Monday, December 21, 2015 10:44 pm
Subject: RE: dm620

>
>
> I have the DM-620. The sound quality is pretty good. The case is a sheath
> that you slip the recorder into; it does not have a belt clip and it doesn't
> have a flap you can open. I like the sound quality with the Dm-620, but the
> design of the controls is much worse, in my opinion, than on the Dm-520. The
> record, play and sop controls are on the front facing panel, not on the side
> as on the Dm-520. Also, you have to remember to press the 620's Record
> button twice to get a recording.
> In my view, Olympus's design of its recorders has gone way down hill; if you
> want to make a recording on the go and pause, particularly while holding the
> recorder, the Dm-620 is inferior to the Dm-520. 
> Hope this helps. 
> --Original Message-----
> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Stephanie
> Mitchell
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 10:31 PM
> To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
> Subject: dm620
> 
> Hi all,
> I'm thinking of huying a dm620. My dm520 still works, but it's so compact
> and small, with fairly good sound I'd like another one. I have a dm7, which
> has good sound, but it's huge and I'm thinking of selling it, along with my
> ls100 which I'd never used yet.
> Anyway, how does the 620 compare with the 520?
> Thanks,
> Steph
> 
> Mitchell Piano Studio
> Phone: 0450354342
> Web: www.mitchellpianostudio.com 
> 
> 

Mitchell Piano Studio
Phone: 0450354342
Web: www.mitchellpianostudio.com 

Reply via email to