I agree with the points of the design. The 520 is perfect. I love the stuff on the side, and the fact that I have the belt clip. I can literally press record on the go. I hate having to remove the recorder to start recording, then have to put it back again. Maybe I need to look at other opms. Any ideas? Steph
----- Original Message ----- From: john riehl <realma...@verizon.net> To: "'Pc Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Date: Monday, December 21, 2015 10:44 pm Subject: RE: dm620 > > > I have the DM-620. The sound quality is pretty good. The case is a sheath > that you slip the recorder into; it does not have a belt clip and it doesn't > have a flap you can open. I like the sound quality with the Dm-620, but the > design of the controls is much worse, in my opinion, than on the Dm-520. The > record, play and sop controls are on the front facing panel, not on the side > as on the Dm-520. Also, you have to remember to press the 620's Record > button twice to get a recording. > In my view, Olympus's design of its recorders has gone way down hill; if you > want to make a recording on the go and pause, particularly while holding the > recorder, the Dm-620 is inferior to the Dm-520. > Hope this helps. > --Original Message----- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Stephanie > Mitchell > Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 10:31 PM > To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org > Subject: dm620 > > Hi all, > I'm thinking of huying a dm620. My dm520 still works, but it's so compact > and small, with fairly good sound I'd like another one. I have a dm7, which > has good sound, but it's huge and I'm thinking of selling it, along with my > ls100 which I'd never used yet. > Anyway, how does the 620 compare with the 520? > Thanks, > Steph > > Mitchell Piano Studio > Phone: 0450354342 > Web: www.mitchellpianostudio.com > > Mitchell Piano Studio Phone: 0450354342 Web: www.mitchellpianostudio.com