Thanks for your feed-back. It would be interesting to hear from the WG if indeed we need two methods. To each specific problem we can certainly find a number of way to solve it, but let's try to make sure that we do not specify a new technique if we can use what exist today.
WG ? Thanks. JP. On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:25 AM, 王磊 wrote: > Hi, Xuerong and PCEers > > I have read the draft. It provides an alternate method that extends > BRPC and PCEP protocol to get TE information of Inter-AS biderectional > links. In my opinion, It is useful for the smooth upgrade of existing > MPLS/GMPLS networks to support Inter-AS bidirectional path > computation, because it need not any extension or modification to the > IGP (such as OSPF and IS-IS) used in MPLS/GMPLS-enabled > routers/switches. However, the method of IGP extension is also > applicable and suitable for new network-equipments. So, I think there > is no conflict between these two metods. The draft could be used in > the scenario where the IGP extension of Inter-AS biderectional links > can not be supported. > > Thanks. > > Lei Wang > Tsinghua University, Beijing, China > hechen0...@gmail.com or l...@tsinghua.edu.cn > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
