Dear JP, I am one of the co-authors of draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep- extension-l3vpn. This draft defines the PCEP extensions for the dynamic creation of MPLS TE LSPs between BGP/MPLS IP-VPN sites.
We have been waiting for the signaling protocol(draft-kumaki- murai-l3vpn-rsvp-te) to be standarized. Now, the IESG Last Call has finished and we are now waiting for the Go-Ahead sign of the sponsor AD. Since the signaling protocol standardization is almost finished now, we are considering progressing the PCEP extension draft to a WG item. It has been a while since we last present the WG. Do you think it is proper that we remind the WG on the list about the contents of the PCEP extension together with the progress of the signaling protocol and then ask for WG last call? I think we have agreed to progress the PCEP extension once the signaling protocol standardization is finished. Best Regards, Peng JIANG KDDI _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
