Hi, I agree that, it is a needed functionality.
*Question on Process - * Does this belong in a separate ID or better suited in the * ietf-pce-stateful-pce* as before? I am taking cue from other RFC that added new capability like RFC6006. *Few comments - * (1) Bit 9, 10 are already used 9Global Concurrent Optimization (GCO)[RFC5557<http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5557> ]10P2MP path computation[RFC6006 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc6006>](2) Since both PCEP open message and IGP PCE discovery can be used to notify PCE stateful nature, some text should be added to handle it, For ex how should the implementation behave if there is a difference in the capability between what PCC learned via IGP flooding and open message? (3) BGP-LS A PCC could listen to IGP updates, or use other mechanisms that carry IGP information to interested clients, such as BGP-LS ([I-D.ietf-idr-ls-distribution]). Can BGP-LS be used to advertise PCE? As far as i remember it allow the TE information to be carried in BGP and not PCE Discovery TLVs? Jan: Since you are the author of BGP-LS, maybe you can clarify. Dhruv On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Ina Minei <i...@juniper.net> wrote: > This is useful and straightforward functionality that is much needed for a > deployment and completes the solution. > > I support this draft's adoption as a WG document (but I guess we will wait > for the chairs to send the official poll, right?) > > Ina > > -----Original Message----- > From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jan > Medved (jmedved) > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:49 PM > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE Capability discovery draft: request for review > & adoption as a WG document > > Dear PCE'rs, > > can you please review draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful and send your > comments to the list? The draft is at: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful/. > > Also, can you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting > draft-sivabalan-pce-disco-stateful as a PCE WG document? > > > > Thanks a lot in advance, > Siva and Jan > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
