Provided my feedback to one of the authors on this draft earlier. This document should definitely not be "experimental".
I fully support this. -- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:48 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ? Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce