Hi all,
During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear
consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now
need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do
you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a
PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you
do not support the adoption.
Thanks,
JP, Jon & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
