Hi Benoit, Adrian, I have updated Appendix A to include all changes from RFC6006 and made the RBNF changes as a sub-section.
See working copy at - https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt Thanks! Dhruv > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: 30 August 2017 17:39 > To: 'Benoit Claise' <bcla...@cisco.com>; 'The IESG' <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; > 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.i...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce- > rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT) > > Morning Komrade Claise, > > Did you spot Appendix A? > > A > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise > > Sent: 30 August 2017 10:32 > > To: The IESG > > Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; > > pce-cha...@ietf.org; > Fred > > Baker > > Subject: [Pce] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce- > rfc6006bis-03: > (with > > COMMENT) > > > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > > this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > - Where is the "diff from RFC6006" section? > > The following is not useful: > > > > This document obsoletes RFC 6006 and incorporates all outstanding > > Errata: > > > > o Erratum with IDs: 3819, 3830, 3836, 4867, and 4868. > > > > I found "Appendix A. Summary of the RBNF Changes from RFC 6006", as a > > good start, but it doesn't even appear in the table of content. Why? > > > > - I've not been following the IPR situation (as described by Alvaro), > > but > would > > like to understand and it should be discussed during the telechat. Is > > it the case that https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1686/ (related to > > RFC6006) is updated by https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2983/ (related > > to RFC6006 and RFC6006bis)? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
