Hi, It looks like the errata form has become a playground. ADs, please feel free to reject.
Thanks, Julien Nov. 30, 2017 - rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4674, > "Requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5192 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Amitkumar <amitku...@explo.com> > > Section: 463846379684 > > Original Text > ------------- > Ok > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Ok > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC4674 (draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-05) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE) > Discovery > Publication Date : October 2006 > Author(s) : J.L. Le Roux, Ed. > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Path Computation Element > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
