Hi Adrian Thanks for the suggestion and for the gentle reminder. I have just polled for adoption of this draft. Given this, it does not sound like you will need this slot, after all. Of course, if the poll throws up issues that must be discussed, or something else turns up, please feel free to renew your request.
Best regards Jon and Julien -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: 19 February 2018 16:35 To: pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 101 Hi Julien, all. > - the draft(s) you want to discuss, draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03.txt > - the expected presenter name, Adrian Farrel > - the requested duration, including question time as part of the slot, 10 minutes > - the reason why you need face-to-face time as opposed to using the > mailing list (open 24/7). Weeell, we don't actually have anything to discuss, but we figure that it is now four months since there was general support for moving this forward as WG work, and while we have been working on the text and on implementation, we don't seem to have got any traction with the WG chairs. So, we would spend our 10 minutes helping the chairs prioritise thee WG work :-) Of course, if the WG would like a reminder of what this work is and why it is important, we would happily deliver that. OTOH, rtfm. A _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
