Adrian, Would be my pleasure ;-)
Regards, Jeff > On Feb 20, 2018, at 12:53, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > > Jeff, I definitely agree with you about kitchen sinks. > OTOH, in this case the lack of coordination is actually painful and creates a > mess since each vendor uses a different way to instruct its devices after a > PCinitiate has completed successfully. > > A Deployment Considerations section sounds just the thing. Maybe we will lean > on you for text after adoption :-) > > A > > > From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 February 2018 15:39 > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Jonathan Hardwick'; pce@ietf.org > Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > > I’d “carefully” support the adoption, while functionality is needed, and > having complete set in a single protocol has its advantages (and complexity > associated), we already have one “kitchen sink” protocol, that has however > been designed to support 100M of entries and deal with bursty data, PCEP is > yet to get there. Deployment consideration section would be of great value. > > Cheers, > Jeff > From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Adrian Farrel > <adr...@olddog.co.uk> > Reply-To: <adr...@olddog.co.uk> > Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 10:17 > To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>, <pce@ietf.org> > Cc: <pce-cha...@ietf.org>, <draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > > Unsurprisingly, I also think we should adopt this drafts. > To me it seems like a critical piece of function that we "forgot" when we > started to allow thee PCE to have control. > AFAIK current implementations "bodge" around the issue backing up PCEP > messages with other control messages (such as Netconf) to say how the LSP > should be used. > We need a consolidated approach. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick > Sent: 20 February 2018 13:34 > To: pce@ietf.org > Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > > Dear PCE WG > > This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > a PCE working group document. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec/ > > Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating > “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your > reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see > addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends on Tuesday, March 6. > > Many thanks, > > Jon and Julien > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
