The following errata report has been verified for RFC8231, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5376 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Hari Krushna Kotni <hko...@juniper.net> Date Reported: 2018-06-01 Verified by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 7.2 Original Text ------------- In case of SRP-ID-number wrapping, the last SRP-ID-number before the wrapping MUST be explicitly acknowledged, to avoid a situation where SRP-ID-numbers remain unacknowledged after the wrap. This means that the PCC may need to issue two PCUpd messages on detecting a wrap. Corrected Text -------------- In case of SRP-ID-number wrapping, the last SRP-ID-number before the wrapping MUST be explicitly acknowledged, to avoid a situation where SRP-ID-numbers remain unacknowledged after the wrap. This means that the PCC may need to issue two PCRpt messages on detecting a wrap. Notes ----- incase of srp id wrap, once PCC detects it, PCC needs to issue PCRpt message not PCUpd message. -------------------------------------- RFC8231 (draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE Publication Date : September 2017 Author(s) : E. Crabbe, I. Minei, J. Medved, R. Varga Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
