Yes/Support. This draft give controller the capabilities to design the SRv6 Path via PCEP protocol.
Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Feb 22, 2019, at 22:51, Andrew G. Malis <agma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes/support. This is a very important companion draft to > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing. > > Cheers, > Andy > > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:47 AM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi WG, >> >> Please read & review draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-04 [1] and >> send your comments to the mailing list. >> >> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons >> - Why / why not? >> >> What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? >> >> Are you willing to work on this draft? Do you plan to implement it? >> >> This poll will run until 8th March. >> >> Thanks, >> PCE Chairs >> >> [1] >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/?include_text=1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pce mailing list >> Pce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
