Hi, Since you indicated that you thought your draft was ready for adoption by the working group, I have done a quick review. I realise that this is work in progress and does not need to be perfect or even complete at this stage, so I have tried to just pick out some points to tidy up the document so that an adoption poll will be a bit smoother.
Thanks, Adrian ==== The Table of Contents seems to be out of date. --- It would be really helpful if you could include an Implementation Status section consistent with the working group policy. If you have nothing to report then just simply report that you have nothing to report. --- Section 3 has An LSP MUST belong to a single VNAG. I think you probably mean... An LSP MUST NOT belong to more than one VNAG. --- The figure at the top of page 6 seems to be about explaining VNs, but you probably don't need to do that in this document. --- Section 4 The VIRTUAL-NETWORK-TLV MUST be included in VNAG object. I think the "VNAG object" is an Association Object with the Association Type set to "VNAG". --- Section 6 Could you think about the implications of the VN name being in clear text. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
