I have read the document. It's straightforward and clear. I think it's ready to be published. Cheers Jon
-----Original Message----- From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 09 September 2019 12:05 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 NOTE: Message is from an external sender Hi WG, We have only one response so far. This is a focused small document, with just 1-2 pages of the main content that updates a problem that was found in RFC 8231. This might seem trivial but it is important as a WG that we fix issues in our published RFCs and make it easier for later work and implementations. Please read and comment, if you feel the document should not be published, please state your reason. We urge you to be vocal on the list either way, you have another week as WG LC closes on 16th Sept. Thanks! PCE Chairs On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:43 PM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi WG, > > This email starts a 'working group last call' for > draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 [1]. This I-D is focused and has an > uncontroversial fix to RFC 8231, we are moving it directly to WGLC. > See [2] for context. > > Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. > > If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate > your concern. > > If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version > and it is ready for publication. > > As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. > > The WG LC will end on 16th September 2019. > > Thanks, > PCE Chairs > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags/ > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tTkJKO34xTD0CY48IJCk5FjmiJ4 _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
