Hi, I’m willing to be guided here.
I don’t think the new draft makes any changes to how a code point seen in in the wild should be interpreted. And the “updates” relationship will be in place. But if people think it is valuable we could have… IANA maintains a registry called the “Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers” registry with a subregistry called " SRP Object Flag Field". IANA is requested to update the Reference in that subregistry to include a reference to this document in addition to [RFC8281]. Best, Adrian > This document is well written and clear. Thanks for the update. Please find > below > my comments on draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01. > > OLD: > 8. IANA Considerations > This document makes no requests for IANA action > > NEW: > The current IANA for this object has reference to "RFC8281" > (https://www.iana.org/ > assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#srp-object-flag-field) Dont we want that refer to > this > new draft since we have updated the text ? _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
