Hi Dhruv, Julien, et al., yes/support I've read the draft and believe it is ready to be adopted by the PCE WG. The draft proposes a much-needed solution to OAM in SR-MPLS.
Regards, Greg On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM <julien.meu...@orange.com> wrote: > Hi PCE WG, > > In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there > for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now > like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be > the foundation for a PCE WG's work item? > > Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment > you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt > it. This poll will end on October 9. > > Thanks, > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
