The following errata report has been verified for RFC8281, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6301 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Samuel Sidor <[email protected]> Date Reported: 2020-10-06 Verified by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 5.1 Original Text ------------- <PCE-initiated-lsp-request> ::= (<PCE-initiated-lsp-instantiation>| <PCE-initiated-lsp-deletion>) <PCE-initiated-lsp-instantiation> ::= <SRP> <LSP> [<END-POINTS>] <ERO> [<attribute-list>] <PCE-initiated-lsp-deletion> ::= <SRP> <LSP> Corrected Text -------------- <PCE-initiated-lsp-request> ::= (<PCE-initiated-lsp-instantiation>| <PCE-initiated-lsp-deletion-or-reclamation>) <PCE-initiated-lsp-instantiation> ::= <SRP> <LSP> [<END-POINTS>] <ERO> [<attribute-list>] <PCE-initiated-lsp-deletion-or-reclamation> ::= <SRP> <LSP> Notes ----- Update needed to solve ambiguity for any extra object included after SRP and LSP objects in reclaim delegation request, which is coming from: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8281#section-6 A PCE (either the original or one of its backups) sends a PCInitiate message that includes just the SRP and LSP objects and carries the PLSP-ID of the LSP it wants to take control of. -------------------------------------- RFC8281 (draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model Publication Date : December 2017 Author(s) : E. Crabbe, I. Minei, S. Sivabalan, R. Varga Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
