Thanks to the authors for cleaning this up a lot since last time. I don't object to adoption. Would be nice to have evidence of someone needing a bit now, but by the time this becomes an RFC it is reasonably possible.
Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 01 February 2021 17:48 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 This is a small draft that extends the flags in the LSP Objects by defining a new LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV. Note that the existing sub-registry "LSP Object Flag Field" is almost fully assigned. https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#lsp-object-flag-field Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 15th Feb. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
