Yes, the draft should be adopted. It addresses a crucial gap in the TE multipath toolkit.
Regards, -Pavan (as a co-author) On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:53 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the > list. > > Please respond by Wednesday 28th April. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
