I support the adoption of this draft because it defines PCEP extensions to support ongoing SR P2MP work in SPRING, PIM and BESS WGs.
Thanks, -Rishabh On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:34 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-03. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the > list. > > Please respond by Monday 8th Nov. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
