Hi Julien, Since the text already had WG consensus when it was part of the draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec, I would like to support the adoption.
Thank you! Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 8:57 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec Hi all and best wishes for 2022. Gentle reminder: we started a poll some days before Christmas. If it was pure new work, I'd assume there isn't enough interest yet. Since it's pre-existing work that has been split to catch up with another WG's work in progress, I'd feel more comfortable to get some explicit feedback. Thanks, Julien On 16/12/2021 17:49, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: > Hi all, > > This message is the following step to the situation previously > summarized by Dhruv [1]. > > As a result, do you believe that draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec [2] is > a right foundation to become (again) a PCE WG item? > > Please respond to the PCE list, including any comment you may feel > useful, especially in case of negative answer. > > Thanks, > > Julien > > (As a reminder, Dhruv recused himself from the administrative > process.) > > -- > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4f8f_3Qs_uA3T16CTCAsoOJnt58/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
