Thanks John and Lars!
I wonder though if it is a good idea to change in this one place, when
every other PCEP RFCs (including the base RFC 5440) uses -
Unassigned flags MUST be set to zero on transmission and MUST be
ignored on receipt.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:04 PM Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org> wrote:
> On 2022-10-20, at 16:51, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote:
> >
> > I read this comment differently. Here’s what I took it to mean. In the
> clause "Unassigned flags MUST be set to zero on transmission”, if you read
> that in the narrowest possible way, it might require an implementation to
> know what flags are unassigned, so that it can set them to zero on
> transmission. If the clause were changed to “Flags unsupported by the
> implementation MUST be set to zero on transmission” I think that would be
> responsive to (how I read) the comment. The same point would apply to
> Section 3.1.
> >
> > That’s just my reading of course and Lars should clarify as needed.
>
> This is exactly what I was trying to express, thanks.
>
> Lars
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
