Thanks John and Lars! I wonder though if it is a good idea to change in this one place, when every other PCEP RFCs (including the base RFC 5440) uses -
Unassigned flags MUST be set to zero on transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt. Thanks! Dhruv On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:04 PM Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org> wrote: > On 2022-10-20, at 16:51, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote: > > > > I read this comment differently. Here’s what I took it to mean. In the > clause "Unassigned flags MUST be set to zero on transmission”, if you read > that in the narrowest possible way, it might require an implementation to > know what flags are unassigned, so that it can set them to zero on > transmission. If the clause were changed to “Flags unsupported by the > implementation MUST be set to zero on transmission” I think that would be > responsive to (how I read) the comment. The same point would apply to > Section 3.1. > > > > That’s just my reading of course and Lars should clarify as needed. > > This is exactly what I was trying to express, thanks. > > Lars >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce