Hi Scott, Thanks for your early review. Much appreciated!
Thanks! Dhruv On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 11:16 PM Scott Kelly via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Scott Kelly > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area > directors. > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any > other > last call comments. > > This is an early review that was intended for completion in early December; > sorry I'm so late, and I hope the review is still useful. > > The summary of the review is Ready. > > >From the abstract, this document defines a YANG data model for the > management > of Path Computation Element communications Protocol (PCEP) for > communications > between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation Element > (PCE), > or between two PCEs. The data model includes configuration and state data. > > The security considerations section appears complete, and complies with the > requirements set forth in > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines. This > document is > on the right track, from a security perspective. > > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
