Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- === Comments === - from idnits -> The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC5440, but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should. - from idnits - the authors should check the miscellaneous warnings, especially paying attention to the comments re: RFC 5378. I do not see anything in the shepherd write-up about this. - Section 9 - Obsolete normative reference: RFC 7525 (Obsoleted by RFC 9325) _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
