Hi all,

No concerns have been expressed about this early allocation. We'll thus proceed to the next step.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


On 28/07/2023 15:58, Julien Meuric wrote:
Hi WG,

We have received a request from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path for an early code point allocation on the association type referred to in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-11#name-iana-considerations

RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:

b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
(henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
in an Internet-Draft.
c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.

If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria or believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If the chairs hear no objections by Monday August 21st, we will kick off the early allocation request.

Thanks!

Dhruv & Julien


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to