Dear WG

I have read this document and support WG adoption of this I-D which proposes 
extensions to support branch node handling needed for P2MP.

And I also suggest to add an PCECC P2MP LSP setup sequence in section 4.3.3.1 
to better speicify the use case with 3 instances of CCI
objects in the PCEP messages. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Quan

<Hi all,

<This is an adoption poll for 
<draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp-14 [1]. WG, do you 
<think that the aforementioned I-D is ready to serve as a foundation for 
<a PCE WG item?

<Please use the PCE mailing list to express your support or your reasons 
<to be opposed.

<Thanks,

<Julien

--
[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp/
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to