Dear WG
I have read this document and support WG adoption of this I-D which proposes
extensions to support branch node handling needed for P2MP.
And I also suggest to add an PCECC P2MP LSP setup sequence in section 4.3.3.1
to better speicify the use case with 3 instances of CCI
objects in the PCEP messages. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Quan
<Hi all,
<This is an adoption poll for
<draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp-14 [1]. WG, do you
<think that the aforementioned I-D is ready to serve as a foundation for
<a PCE WG item?
<Please use the PCE mailing list to express your support or your reasons
<to be opposed.
<Thanks,
<Julien
--
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp/
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]