Sounds good, thanks Samuel!
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 5:30 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ketan, > > > > Yes, we are updating text in the draft to consider that part as well (but > still partially allowing use of SID filtering for 2 to 127). I planned to > cover that part as part response in original mail thread with your comments > with already updated document as well. > > > > Regards, > > Samuel > > > > *From:* Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2025 1:52 PM > *To:* Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; pce-chairs <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo - SID filtering > simplification > > > > Hi Samuel/WG, > > > > Thanks for following up on this point. > > > > As I had mentioned in my review, it is problematic to specify anything > concretely for Algos 2 to 127. This is because they are subject to what may > be specified by future documents (i.e., in LSR WG). Therefore, from a > protocol correctness perspective, please consider making only suggestions > or bringing up the idea that SID filtering can be applied to those algos, > but leave it to future specs to actually specify such behavior. > > > > I hope you can consider this as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Ketan > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 3:05 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssidor= > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi PCE WG, > > > > During the AD review of the PCEP SID Algorithm draft, comment was raised > by Ketan (thank you for detailed review) related to benefits of SID > filtering for the Flex-Algo range of SR-Algorithms. > > After discussions with the co-authors, we have decided to limit the use of > SID filtering to the *non-Flex-Algo range* of SR-Algorithms. As a result: > > - *SID Filtering*: Applicable only to *SR-Algorithm values 0-127*: > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-path-computation-with-sid-f > > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-path-computation-with-sid-f%22%20t> > - *Flex-Algo Path Computation*: Applicable to *SR-Algorithm values > 128-255*: > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-flexible-algorithm-path-com > > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-flexible-algorithm-path-com%22%20t> > > As a result of this change, the *F flag* in the SR-Algorithm TLV will no > longer be required. This flag was originally introduced to allow the > Flex-Algo range to be used with both - SID filtering and Flex-Algo path > computation. > > We believe this change simplifies the specification and improves clarity > while maintaining the intended functionality of the draft. > > > > If you have any concerns or objections to this proposed change, please > respond to the mailing list by *17th June*. > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Samuel > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
