Hi all, II am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks Andrew From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 at 1:11 AM To: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Andrew Stone (Nokia) <[email protected]>, Jalil, Luay <[email protected]>, Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi Authors, In preparation for WG LC call on this draft, we'd like all authors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. - I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. - I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Note that there is an existing disclosure - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/6230/ Further, Note that while we explicitly confirm IPR with document authors, the responsibility to disclose IPR applies to all contributors and participants in IETF activities, as outlined in BCP 79. Thanks, Dhruv
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
