Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-26: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work done in this document and for addressing my previous blocking DISCUSS (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ayCXnZU4FrhAm9yPH-AbJ3qilYw/ ) The COMMENTS below are non blocking but should be considered though. ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 Strongly suggest to add the position of the S flag rather than waiting to reach the IANA considerations section. ### Section 4.2.1 Please add an informative URI reference to the IANA registry. ### Sections 6.2 and 6.4 When can the "SHOULD" be bypassed ? or what are the consequences of doing so. ### Update references As indicated by idnits, several I-Ds are now RFC (e.g., RFC 9843) even before the submission date of this I-D, so refresh these references. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
