Hi WG,

I support the adoption of this draft. The proposed extensions to the SR-ERO 
subobject are backward-compatible and architecturally sound.  This draft 
fills a clear gap in the current PCEP specifications.


BR,


zhenlin
[email protected]
China Telecom Research Institute
         原始邮件
         
       
发件人:Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]&gt;
发件时间:2025年12月10日 21:03
收件人:pce <[email protected]&gt;
抄送:pce-chairs <[email protected]&gt;
主题:[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification-11



Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll 
for&nbsp;draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification-11

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / 
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to 
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Wednesday 31st Dec&nbsp;2025.

Please be more vocal during WG polls!

Thanks!
Dhruv &amp; Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to