Hi Julien,

Just seeing this now as I pressed send on reply to Dhruv  =) Looks like we’re 
aligned with what I just sent! All agreed.

Thanks!
Andrew

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2026 at 12:58 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]>, Andrew Stone (Nokia) 
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>, [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-11 
(Ends 2026-01-26)

Hi Andrew,

WGLC is still a right time to raise this question. Even if a separate document 
would have been clearer to specify a generic feature, I agree with Dhruv: we 
could still rearrange/reword the corresponding section(s) to state that this 
part is generic and may be implemented independently of the remainder of the 
document.
As a next step, you could event consider editing a new I-D advertising the data 
plane-agnostic applicability of this mechanism and pointing the relevant 
section of the current document for its specification.

Thanks for sharing that comment,

Julien


On 08/01/2026 06:51:30 Dhruv Dhody 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, wrote:

Hi Andrew,

As a WG participant...

On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 4:42 AM Andrew Stone (Nokia) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Authors,

I have a question which I realize is a bit late in the process: was it 
considered to move out carrying of Router IDs in the Open Object (Section 5.4 + 
7.1.2) to be in an independent document?  I find that function would be quite 
useful independent of any specific dataplane or path setup type as a generic 
capability in PCEP.


Dhruv: This should be possible.
Another approach could be to explicitly state that these are generic and thus 
applicable beyond PCECC-SR even though it is the PCECC-SR document that defines 
and uses them first?
Thoughts?

Thanks!
Dhruv


Thanks
Andrew

From: Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 at 2:00 PM


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext<http://nok.it/ext> for 
additional information.



Hi WG,

This email marks the start of the WG last call for 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr -

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr/

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft on the mailing list. If 
you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your 
concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest 
version and that it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review 
comments and nits are most welcome.

This Working Group Last Call ends on Monday, 2026-01-26.

A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption.

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-11.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-11


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to