All, I should have been more careful with my acronyms.
PCECP is the generic protocol. In other words, what the requirements describe. The job vacancy we are trying to fill. PCEP is JP's (and others) proposed solution. Cheers, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:27 PM Subject: [Pce] Choosing the PCE protocol > Hi, > > Three candidate protocols have been brought to my attention for us to > consider. These are (in no specific order): > - HTTP > - PCECP (as draft-vasseur-pce-pcep-02.txt) > - COPS > > I would like to close the nomination period, and move on to select our > protocol. > > The best approach will be if supporters of the candidate protocols > indicate (briefly) why their proposed protocol is suitable. It would also > be helpful if they were frank about what the weaknesses of their proposal > are. > > And please - this is not an election, it is an interview process. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > PS The reason why JP is keeping quite on this is that he is an author of > draft-vasseur-pce-pcep-02.txt and so (quite rightly) is not occupying the > chair during this discussion. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
