Good day, I put my vote in support for the PCEP draft-vasseur-pce-pcep-02.txt becoming a WG draft.
Darek Darek Skalecki Optical Networks Nortel [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: November 18, 2005 11:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Pce] Working group next steps for protocols Hi, Following up from the Vancouver meeting (per the meeting report) I would like your opinion on the following actions. 1. Discovery solutions work. The meeting had good support for adopting draft-leroux-pce-disco-proto-igp-00.txt as a Working Group draft to provide IGP-based solutions for PCE discovery. What is your opinion on this becoming a WG draft? 2. PCE Communications Protocol The Vancouver meeting discussed both the process of selecting a PCECP and the candidate protocol (PCEP) described in draft-vasseur-pce-pcep-02.txt. The mood of the meeting was that PCEP should be worked on within the working group, and there was no objection to this becoming a WG draft. What is your opinion on this becoming a WG draft? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
