Dear JP,
:-)
I support this work as a working group document.
The ideas are good, relevant and the document shows
a good start in the right direction for a PCE WG document.
The work relates to the text in the third paragraph
of the existing charter and the first Work Item. The first
Work Item may need to be explicitly expanded to include the
inter-layer work as well as inter-area and inter-AS.
--
Eric Gray
--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: JP Vasseur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:22 AM
--> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--> Subject: [Pce] opinion on adopting
--> draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-frwk-00.txt as a new PCE WG document ?
-->
--> Dear WG,
-->
--> As you know, we already have a WG ID for the Inter-layer
--> requirements
--> (draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-01.txt). During the last WG
--> meeting,
--> it was discussed to convert the Inter-layer applicability
--> ID into an
--> inter-layer framework ID, which has now been posted:
-->
[http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-frwk-00.txt]
-->
--> Could you please voice on opinion on adopting [this draft] as a
--> PCE WG document ?
-->
--> Thanks.
-->
--> JP.
-->
--> _______________________________________________
--> Pce mailing list
--> [email protected]
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
-->
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
