Yes it should be a WG document. Dean
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur) > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Pce] opinion on adopting > draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-frwk-00.txt asa new PCE WG document ? > > Dear WG, > > As you know, we already have a WG ID for the Inter-layer > requirements (draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-01.txt). During > the last WG meeting, it was discussed to convert the > Inter-layer applicability ID into an inter-layer framework > ID, which has now been posted: draft-oki-pce- inter-layer-frwk-00.txt. > > Could you please voice on opinion on adopting > draft-oki-pce-inter- layer-frwk-00.txt as a PCE WG document ? > > Thanks. > > JP. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
