section 4.7 Inter-area Diverse Path computation
o) wrt 6. Security Considerations "IGP areas are administrated by the same
entity. .."
does the latter ensure uniqueness of the SRLG IDs ?
o) The response message MUST allow indicating the level of diversity of
a set of computed loose paths.
do you mean partial disjointness ? or something equivalent ?
o) last sentence ยง3 unclear to me wrt to the next sentence - is it
referring to a
diversity of a given wrt to a set of resources but the next sentence
refers to the
diversity of a given LSP wrt to a set of other LSPs but also their SRLG
set for inst. ?
thanks,
- d.
JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22/11/2006 15:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: [Pce] Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-04.txt
Dear WG,
A new revision of draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs (rev -04) has
been posted that addresses the remaining issues/comments.
This email initiates a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-
pcecp-interarea-reqs-04.txt. The last call will end on December 8th
at noon EST.
Please send your comments to the mailing list.
Thanks.
JP.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
