Hi This is an important piece. I'm in favor.
Regards, JL > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Adrian Farrel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 31 janvier 2007 01:55 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : [Pce] Path Key draft to WG status? > > Hi, > > draft-bradford-pce-path-key-01.txt was presented in San Diego > and there was some interest and a general agreement that the > work was needed for confidentiality of path segments computed > by cooperating PCEs, for example in the BRPC mode of operation. > > Since then we have produced a new version to address some > comments made in San Diego and privately to the authors. Rich > sent a note about the changes on 11th January. > > Since JP and I are both co-authors of this work we need to > move forward with some caution, but we believe that this is a > necessary part of the puzzle and that the current draft is in > good shape to become a Working Group draft. We can then build > on it (hopefully with input from the working group) until it > is fully stable and complete. > > So opinions please: is draft-bradford-pce-path-key-02.txt > ready to be a WG draft? > > Thanks, > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
