Hi Den, > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mardi 8 mai 2007 15:39 > À : [email protected] > Objet : [Pce] Comments on PCEP implementation > > Hello, > > I also implementing PCEP protocol. Your notices to the > current draft are very interesting. > For me was the most interesting question with 2 BANDWIDTH objects. > If I assume, that the BNF Notation should be correct...
Actually the BNF is wrong, there can be two bandwidth objects, this is used during reoptimization to indicate the old a new bandwidths. The BNF will be updated. Regards JL > Could it be possible that these 2 objects are in the > different <request>'s? > (Perhaps not, because of Request-ID-Number in RP object... > ok, forget it) > > Have you already imlemented the > 1) TLV(s) in the LSPA object and > 2) Label-subobjects for ERO and RRO? > > If yes, could you say me please, where can i find the formats > for them. > > Thanks > > -- > "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... > Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
