Hi Santanu,
Yes, we have plans to update the MIB with the below configurable
parameters in its next version.
Regards,
Kiran.
----- Original Message -----
From: "santanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "A S Kiran Koushik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-00.txt (PCE-PCEP-DRAFT-MIB)
Dear Kiran and Emile,
I have some more questions below:-
Section 8.1 of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-07.txt says:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-07.txt>
A PCEP implementation SHOULD allow configuring the following PCEP
session parameters on a PCEP peer:
o The local keepalive and Deadtimer (i.e. parameters send by the
PCEP speaker in an Open message),
o The maximum acceptable remote keepalive and dead timers
(i.e.parameters sent by a peer in an Open message),
o Negotiation enabled or disabled,
o If negotiation is allowed, the minimum acceptable Keepalive and
Deadtimer timers sent by a PCEP peer,
o The SyncTimer,
o The maximum number of sessions that can be setup
o Request timer: amount of time a PCC waits for a reply before
resending its path computation requests (potentially to an
alternate PCE).
But, these parameters are not configurable in any of the tables
mentioned in draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-00.txt
Section 8.1 also says:
A PCEP implementation SHOULD allow configuring
a specific PCEP session with a given PCEP peer. This includes the
configuration of the following parameters:
o The IP address of the PCEP peer,
o The PCEP speaker role: PCC, PCE or both,
o Whether the PCEP speaker should initiate the PCEP session or wait
for initiation by the peer,
o The PCEP session parameters, as listed above, if they differ from
the default parameters,
o A set of PCEP policies including the type of operations allowed
for the PCEP peer (e.g. diverse path computation, synchronization,
etc.)
A PCEP implementation MUST allow restricting the set of PCEP peers
that can initiate a PCEP session with the PCEP speaker (e.g. list of
authorized PCEP peers, all PCEP peers in the area, all PCEP peers in
the AS).
Do you have any plan to add these parameters in any new/existing table(s) ?
Thanks,
Santanu Mazumder
A S Kiran Koushik wrote:
Hi pce-team,
We are working on updating the PCE-PCEP-DRAFT-MIB
(PCE communication protocol MIB) with some editorial changes.
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kkoushik-pce-pcep-mib-00.txt
Can some of you kindly review the existing draft and let us know of any
comments/suggestions. That way we can fix them by the deadline.
Also we are planning to request this to be a working group document.
If there are any objections to this, please let us know and we will
work on fixing them.
Thanks,
Kiran and Emile.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
