I also support it.
Cheers,
Jau.
On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:53 PM, A S Kiran Koushik wrote:
Hi,
This draft has useful information required to monitor and troubleshoot
PCEs and in conjunction with the PCE MIBs will provide an excellent
PCE management framework.
I support that this be made a WG document.
Regards,
Kiran. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:09 PM
Subject: [Pce] Considering draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt for
WG status
Hi,
draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt was updated last month to take
into account issues raised in Prague and on the mailing list.
The I-D specifies procedures and extensions to PCEP in order to
gather information about the state of the chain of PCEs involved
in a path computation chain for troubleshooting and performance
monitoring purposes.
Please state your opinion on whether this should become a working
group draft.
Thanks,
Adrian _______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
