Hi Dan,

On Jul 7, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Dan Li wrote:

Dear the authors of BRPC,

We just published a new draft which we think is worth to be reviewed by you:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pce/draft-xia-pce-hybrid-network-00.txt

The purpose of the draft is:
- This draft is primarily to explain a problem that we think is a real deployment scenario;
- We believe that BRPC can be used to solve the problem;
- If the WG is in agreement, we would like to propose a few paragraphs to be added to [brpc]; - If the WG would like to discuss this issue more, we would be happy to present it in Chicago.

Please let us know what's your suggestion. We greatly appreciate your time to look at this new draft.


As you know the whole point of using a Multi-PCE approach with BRPC is to compute the shortest inter-domain constrained path (in addition to diverse paths, ... ).

The case you're looking at in this ID (called Hybrid network) can no longer guarantee that
you'll find the shortest path of course.

Referring to your first example, the most downstream PCE will only see the next hops to the downstream domain. So even if by using BRPC between the first set of domains where you have cooperative PCEs you get the shortest path between the source and the set of entry boundary nodes of the first non-PCE domain, this does not guarantee
you anything in term of path efficiency ...

Furthermore since you get several paths, would you try to signal two TE LSPs in which
case they may end up blocking each other ?

Note that this comment applies to the first two cases of section 2.2

The case 3 of section 2.2 suggests to use Virtual Inter-AS TE Links: please refer to the discussions on the list with regards to TE aggregation: this option has been examined a number of times and has been rejected. Adrian and I still have in our plate to document this.

And of course, if you start to alternate a number of PCE enabled and non PCE enabled domains, the result gets not only extremely complex but more importantly highly unpredictable
in term of path quality.

Thanks.

JP.

Best regards,

Dan Li & Hongmiao Xia


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to