Le Monday 13 June 2011 à 19:24 -0300, Sérgio Cipolla a écrit : > Now an observation. In a constructive manner. > I see that Julien Lavergne is mostly the only one that has been > working > on the apps but ideally, in a non technical opinion as I'm not a > programmer, I think that the master branch in git should be reserved > for > bug fixes and pre-tested improvements. > Untested code (like these recent gtk3 compatibility commits that have > broken, for instance, lxpanel and lxterminal in a very basic way or > gpicview that has something that looks like a typo and makes it not > even > compile) would be commited to another branch and then the commiter > could > ask for testing in the mailing list. I done this in the past, but I didn't have any feedback about my changes.
git HEAD should not be used for daily usage. But it's used because there is not enough releases of many components. Martin and I could probably help in the process, but we don't have access for uploading tarballs on sourceforce. That's also why lxtask was not officially release weeks ago. Regards, Julien Lavergne ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Pcmanfm-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcmanfm-develop
