Hello!
Jonathan Marsden has written on Monday, 9 July, at 17:26:
>>> I hope PCMan will decide what to do with 'gksu' default.
>> Thank you. I think it should be blank, like the 'terminal' field.
>It might be preferable to have a post-install script look for the
>presence of one of a list of such "become root" utilities, and put the
>entry for the first one it finds from that list into the system-wide
>pcmanfm configuration. If it finds none of them, it can leave the
>field blank.
>Once the list was reasonably complete, that approach should work for a
>majority of end users, "out of the box", without needing their active
>participation in configuring it by hand.
>The same approach could also be used for the terminal field, of course.
This is good approach but this isn't pcmanfm level but rather package
management one so it's better to leave package-independent default config
that is shipped with pcmanfm without such default, as Sergio proposed. So
packages can insert their defaults in post-install scripts or in package
specific patch (you know about alternatives system in Debian perhaps). If
there will be no objections then I'll remove that default.
Thank you!
Andriy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Pcmanfm-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcmanfm-develop
